Former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin and NewJeans have denied many rumors about them, responding to media reports with strong legal threats. Min Hee-jin has been unusually aggressive, calling the reports false and warning of lawsuits. Despite ongoing disputes with HYBE and ADOR, she remains confident.
Min Hee-jin has strongly defended NewJeans, and since November 28, they have acted as one unit. Any allegation against one affects both. Their shared truth must stay aligned. As they face accusations, NewJeans must remain truthful to avoid serious damage.
Recently, they have created a new SNS account under the name “jeanzforfree,” hinting at a different name for upcoming activities amid the legal disputes.
The controversy surrounding them now requires verifying the truth. Allegations are piling up, and despite their denials, the situation seems to point in the opposite direction.
Let’s look back at the accusations piling up against the “community” of Min Hee-jin and NewJeans:
September 30: Min Hee-jin, Hyein’s uncle, and a key figure from Dabo Link met at a house owned by A, the real owner of Dabo Link. Photos confirm the meeting, and A claims Hyein’s uncle suggested a 5 billion won investment in NewJeans.
October 2: Dabo Link announced that Hyein’s uncle, along with other candidates, would be considered for internal director positions in an upcoming general meeting scheduled for November 8.
November 5: Min Hee-jin issued a statement denying any connection to investors, specifically denying any relationship with Dabo Link. In response, Dabo Link withdrew Hyein’s uncle and six other candidates from the director list, and its market value dropped sharply.
November 14: NewJeans sent a formal letter to ADOR, threatening to terminate their contract unless certain issues were addressed. This included a warning about false rumors involving members’ families, particularly Hyein’s uncle.
The situation highlights the tension and confusion surrounding NewJeans’ connections and the ongoing contract dispute with ADOR. Given the details, raising questions seems natural and reasonable. Here are the key questions:
What will NewJeans explain to ADOR, the public, and their fans, Bunnies, about Hyein’s uncle? Even ignorance of the matter would be problematic, as it implicates a breach of contract. Why did Min Hee-jin meet with A during her time at ADOR, and why was Hyein’s uncle present? What did they discuss for three hours? A claims Min Hee-jin and the uncle were plotting to take NewJeans from ADOR. A clear explanation is needed, one that Bunnies can accept. If these suspicions are not evidence of tampering, then what are they? Is Hyein claiming her uncle is not a family member but just an acquaintance?
Min Hee-jin has always tackled suspicions head-on with bold explanations. Her two press conferences showcase her ability to read public sentiment and captivate her audience. Even Son Seok-hee (one of the most influential figures in South Korean media) has described Min Hee-jin as a unique figure, someone whose approach and language break traditional media norms.
However, the issues involving HYBE, ADOR, NewJeans, and Min Hee-jin have moved beyond rumors and now focus on substantial matters. The key issues involve their meeting with A, the role of Hyein’s uncle, and his actions. These are the core of the ongoing “war” and the allegations of tampering.
It is crucial that their explanations address these suspicions in a way that makes sense given the circumstances.
Finally, here are some questions from ordinary workers for NewJeans:
If a company paying 5.2 billion won per member is considered incompetent, what would a capable company look like? Do you really believe contract termination can happen with just a declaration? Are you ready for the potential penalties?